ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2026
Forward and inverse optimality problems of bone adaptation at the homogenised RVE level.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Including anisotropy in homogenised inverse remodelling algorithms for habitual load case estimation in bone.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone was shown to adapt to mechanical loading through the concept of a mechanostat that regulates cell activity to maintain a specific strain signal within the tissue. Current computer models simulate bone resorption and formation in the presence of key biological agents, reproduce a realistic architecture of trabecular bone along principal stresses and estimate changes in bone strength related to immobilisation, overloading, metabolic diseases or drug therapies. However, clinical diagnostics of bone diseases in vivo rely primarily on X-ray-based densitometry and computer tomography that do not have the resolution to describe bone microarchitecture in full detail and evaluation of personalised bone strength is therefore based on a homogenised description of bone mechanical properties using density and fabric. Continuum-level bone adaptation theories rely primarily on bone density and do not involve local optimisation principles to predict fabric. The inverse problems of predicting applied loads from bone morphology typically exploit density but not fabric. Accordingly, this work formulates and provides analytical solutions for optimal bone adaptation at the homogeneous, anisotropic RVE level using bone density- and fabric-mechanical property relationships for three different mechanostat criteria. Two of these criteria elicit different adaptive responses for tensile and compressive strains. Forward solutions for density and fabric are provided at a continuum point for a given local stress, while inverse solutions for local stress are derived for given density and fabric for all three criteria. The 3D solutions are specialised to 2D and 1D for comprehension and compared among the different criteria. In the future work, the obtained solutions will enable simple forward simulation of personalised bone adaptation and inverse estimation of bone loading for clinical diagnostic tools such as high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) or photon counting computed tomography (PCCT).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.