Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530446›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026

Comparison of light scattering-based detection methods for the sizing and number density characterization of extracellular vesicles (EV) isolated from human embryonic kidney (HEK) cell cultures.

William F Pons, Katelyn M Joye, Terri F Bruce, R Kenneth Marcus

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William F PonsDepartment of Chemistry, Biosystems Research Complex, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634-0973, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7829-8394
Katelyn M JoyeClemson Light Imaging Facility, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634-0973, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0077-5490
Terri F BruceClemson Light Imaging Facility, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634-0973, USA.
R Kenneth MarcusDepartment of Chemistry, Biosystems Research Complex, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634-0973, USA. marcusr@clemson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4276-5805

Funding

Capillary-channeled polymers fibers and films - A platform technology for exosome isolation and analyticsR01GM141347 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS, RICHARD KENNETH · 2022 to 2025
$1.7M
Division of Chemistry CHE-2404088Foundation for the National Institutes of Health 1RO1GM141347-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM141347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound nanosized particles excreted by all cells and are of significant interest for biomedical applications such as diagnostic testing and as vectors for therapeutic delivery. EVs are abundant in biofluids, including urine, saliva, blood, and cell culture media, but must be isolated from their complex matrix for use. Once isolated, a primary challenge is determining the EV size distribution and the total number of particles recovered. Multiple detection methods are currently used to characterize EV recoveries in terms of sizing and number density determinations, the most common being nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), flow cytometry, and electron microscopy (transmission (TEM) or scanning (SEM)). Addressed here is a practical assessment of three common light scattering-based methods for the determination of EV population sizing and number densities. NTA, multi-angle light scattering (MALS), and nano-flow cytometry (nFCM) are directly compared. Specifically, the baseline practical advantages and disadvantages of each technique are evaluated via analysis of silica nanoparticle standards. Subsequently, EVs isolated from human embryonic kidney (HEK) cell culture supernatant using a hydrophobic interaction chromatography-based separation on the previously developed polyester (PET) capillary-channeled polymer (C-CP) fiber column platform were characterized. This isolation of high-purity EVs from HEK cell culture matrix components was validated using UV chromatograms, Bradford protein assays, SEM, TEM, and fluorescence nFCM analysis. The relative attributes of these important light scattering methods are presented in terms of their fitness for specific applications and overall effectiveness in EV size and concentration analysis.

Indexed as

Dynamic Light ScatteringExtracellular VesiclesFlow CytometryHEK293 CellsHumansLightNanoparticlesParticle SizeScattering, RadiationEV isolationLight scatteringMulti-angle light scatteringNano-flow cytometryNanoparticle tracking analysis

Identifiers

PMID41530446
PMCPMC13197382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.