ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Development of a Preliminary Diagnostic Tool for the Segmentation of Benign Jaw Lesions in CBCT Images Using nnU-Net v2: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Reporting Guidelines in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: Specialty-Oriented Practical Guide.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of jaw lesions on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images is essential for diagnosis and treatment planning. While previous studies have investigated automated segmentation, most were limited to 2D data, and the performance of newer architectures like nnU-Net v2 remains unexamined. This study evaluated the nnU-Net v2 algorithm for 3D segmentation of jaw lesions and compared its speed to manual expert segmentation. Due to significant class imbalance in the dataset, training a single multiclass segmentation model could have led to dominance of the majority class and reduced Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for minority classes. Therefore, three separate models were developed: the first for all benign jaw lesions (355 CBCT), the second for radicular cysts (305 CBCT), and the third for dentigerous cysts (33 CBCT). The radicular and dentigerous cyst datasets consisted of the same images used in the initial model but were additionally utilized as subsets for lesion-specific evaluation. The models were assessed using precision, recall, and DSC, compared with expert manual segmentation time, and tested on an external dataset. DSC values were 0.70 ± 0.08, 0.70 ± 0.21, and 0.72 ± 0.04 for the benign, radicular, and dentigerous cyst models, respectively. Automated segmentation required less than 1 min, approximately 15 times faster than manual segmentation. DSC on the external dataset ranged from 0.84 to 0.87. The nnU-Net v2-based deep learning models demonstrated consistent segmentation performance across both general and lesion-specific datasets. Furthermore, these models can automatically segment lesions in seconds, providing a substantial time advantage over manual segmentation by expert clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41530422What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.