Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530422›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Development of a Preliminary Diagnostic Tool for the Segmentation of Benign Jaw Lesions in CBCT Images Using nnU-Net v2: An Artificial Intelligence-Based Approach.

Kevser Dinç Başar, İbrahim Tevfik Gülşen, Alican Kuran, Cengiz Evli, Oğuzhan Baydar, Elif Bilgir, Özer Çelik, İbrahim Şevki Bayrakdar, Kaan Orhan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kevser Dinç BaşarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Selçuk University, Konya, 42130, Turkey.
İbrahim Tevfik GülşenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, 07425, Turkey.
Alican KuranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, 41190, Turkey. alican.kuran@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9677-8690
Cengiz EvliDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, 06560, Turkey.
Oğuzhan BaydarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, 26040, Turkey.
Elif BilgirDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, 26040, Turkey.
Özer ÇelikDepartment of Mathematics-Computer, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Science, Eskisehir, 26040, Turkey.
İbrahim Şevki BayrakdarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, 26040, Turkey.
Kaan OrhanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, 06560, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of jaw lesions on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images is essential for diagnosis and treatment planning. While previous studies have investigated automated segmentation, most were limited to 2D data, and the performance of newer architectures like nnU-Net v2 remains unexamined. This study evaluated the nnU-Net v2 algorithm for 3D segmentation of jaw lesions and compared its speed to manual expert segmentation. Due to significant class imbalance in the dataset, training a single multiclass segmentation model could have led to dominance of the majority class and reduced Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for minority classes. Therefore, three separate models were developed: the first for all benign jaw lesions (355 CBCT), the second for radicular cysts (305 CBCT), and the third for dentigerous cysts (33 CBCT). The radicular and dentigerous cyst datasets consisted of the same images used in the initial model but were additionally utilized as subsets for lesion-specific evaluation. The models were assessed using precision, recall, and DSC, compared with expert manual segmentation time, and tested on an external dataset. DSC values were 0.70 ± 0.08, 0.70 ± 0.21, and 0.72 ± 0.04 for the benign, radicular, and dentigerous cyst models, respectively. Automated segmentation required less than 1 min, approximately 15 times faster than manual segmentation. DSC on the external dataset ranged from 0.84 to 0.87. The nnU-Net v2-based deep learning models demonstrated consistent segmentation performance across both general and lesion-specific datasets. Furthermore, these models can automatically segment lesions in seconds, providing a substantial time advantage over manual segmentation by expert clinicians.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCone beam CTDeep learningDentigerous cystJaw pathologyRadicular cyst

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.