Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530420›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Large-Scale Foundation Models for Radiological Image Analysis: Clinical Applications, Technical Challenges, and Future Directions.

Yashbir Singh, Orhan Unal, Farzana Ali, Sara Salehi, Shiba Kuanar, Abdussalam Elhanashi, Quincy A Hathaway, Ashok Chaudhary, Yuankai Huo, Khaled Younis and 5 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yashbir SinghMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Singh.yashbir@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5848-7072
Orhan UnalUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA.
Farzana AliStony Brook University, Stony Brook, USA.
Sara SalehiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Shiba KuanarMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abdussalam ElhanashiUniversity of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Quincy A HathawayDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ashok ChaudharyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yuankai HuoVanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
Khaled YounisMedAiConsult, Cleveland, USA.
Quincy GuUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Varekan KeishingMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yujia WeiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lili ZhangMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Bradley J EricksonMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foundation models represent a transformative paradigm in radiological image analysis, offering large-scale, versatile systems that move beyond traditional task-specific AI approaches. While prior surveys have summarized their capabilities in medical imaging, a critical gap remains-the translation from research innovation to sustainable clinical radiology practice. This review directly addresses the implementation gap by presenting subspecialty-specific deployment strategies, real-world performance benchmarks from clinical settings, and practical PACS/RIS integration protocols informed by deployments across 15 healthcare systems. Rather than cataloging model architectures or theoretical advances, we focus on how radiology departments can effectively and successfully implement foundation models in practice, providing actionable, evidence-based guidance for clinical teams responsible for making adoption and deployment decisions. We explore architectures ranging from Vision Transformers to multimodal systems, their pre-training strategies, and adaptation techniques for medical imaging tasks. Clinical applications across multiple imaging modalities have demonstrated significant advances in lesion detection, disease classification, and automated reporting. Despite this progress, challenges remain in achieving robust clinical validation, navigating regulatory approval, and addressing ethical implementation. In this review, we evaluate key performance metrics and examine integration challenges, with particular attention to issues of data heterogeneity, interpretability, and computational efficiency. This review uniquely integrates an imaging informatics perspective, framing foundation models within the full lifecycle of medical imaging data from acquisition to clinical integration. We also highlight emerging solutions and outline future directions, including next-generation architectures, applications in personalized medicine, and strategies to expand accessibility in resource-constrained settings. We further highlight practical solutions for computational efficiency and accessibility, such as edge computing and model compression, vital for broader institutional adoption. This review provides clinical teams-radiologists, administrators, and imaging informatics specialists-with actionable guidance on foundation model implementation, while also serving as a reference for researchers exploring applied AI translation in radiology.

Indexed as

Deep learningDiagnostic imagingFoundation modelsMulti-modal learningRadiologyVision transformers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.