ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative analysis of machine learning models with SHAP interpretation for causes of highway flood-damage blocking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Highway flood-damage blocking poses a critical threat to transportation system resilience, yet risk assessment is often limited by insufficient modeling of temporal disaster evolution, highly imbalanced data, and weak model interpretability. To address these challenges, this study proposes an integrated modeling framework that combines temporal data augmentation, machine learning, and interpretable mechanism analysis. Three data-balancing strategies-Time-series Generative Adversarial Network (TimeGAN) augmentation, undersampling, and a hybrid approach-were systematically compared to handle imbalanced temporal data. Six machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Decision Tree, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Multilayer Perceptron) were evaluated, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to quantify factor contributions and explore nonlinear effects and interaction patterns. Results show that the Multilayer Perceptron trained on TimeGAN-augmented sequences achieved the highest performance, with an F1 score of 49.81% and PR-AUC of 49.46%. SHAP analysis identified key drivers and their threshold effects: Daily precipitation exceeding 2.8 mm, 7-day effective precipitation (EP 7) exceeding 22 mm, temperature above 21 °C, and average road-stream distance within 1 km (ARSD) above 0.15 km significantly increase the risk of highway flood-damage blocking. High temperature conditions are more likely to coincide with heavy precipitation and elevated EP 7, and their combined effects further amplify blocking risk. Factor contributions also varied across methods, reflecting SHAP's ability to capture nonlinear effects and reveal interaction patterns, whereas linear regression mainly reflects independent linear effects. By integrating temporal generation, systematic model evaluation, and interpretable analysis, this study enhances the accuracy and reliability of highway flood-damage blocking prediction, providing quantitative guidance for flood damage prevention and resilience improvement of highway systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.