Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530346›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Gaze patterns during visual mental imagery reflect part-based generation.

Enea J Weber, Fred W Mast

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enea J WeberDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. enea.weber@unibe.ch.
Fred W MastDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 100014_214940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye movements during visual mental imagery resemble those made during prior perception. Across two experiments, we investigated whether eye movements during imagery reflect a part-by-part generation of mental images, by comparing gaze patterns during mental imagery to those during part-based viewing (using a gaze-contingent window, GCW) and to those during holistic viewing (using an artificial scotoma, AS). In Experiment 1, participants freely encoded and imagined pictures before reinspecting them either part-by-part (GCW condition), or holistically (AS condition). The results show that fixation scanpaths (MultiMatch) and refixation patterns (recurrence quantification analysis) during mental imagery largely mirror those during GCW viewing. In Experiment 2, we examined whether this effect depends on prior perceptual encoding. Pictures were initially encoded either freely, with the AS, or with the GCW, and subsequently imagined. The results show that regardless of how the pictures were initially encoded, gaze patterns during mental imagery systematically resembled part-based perception. The current study provides direct evidence that eye movements during mental imagery reflect a part-by-part generation process of the imagined content, independent of prior perceptual encoding.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsFixation, OcularImaginationVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultEye-trackingGaze-contingent windowMental imagery

Identifiers

PMID41530346
PMCPMC12876999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.