ArticleCommunications psychology2026
Manipulable object processing reveals distinct neural and behavioral signatures for visual, functional, and manipulation properties.
Article in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Manipulable object processing reveals distinct neural and behavioral signatures for visual, functional, and manipulation properties.Communications psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our interactions with objects involve processing a range of object-associated features to assess whether an object can fulfill our intentions. For human-made manipulable objects, these features mainly encompass three interconnected types of knowledge: visual appearance, manner of manipulation, and functional purpose. We investigated these components by breaking them down into their features and exploring how each type of object-related information is processed. Using a release-from-adaptation paradigm - we tested vision, manipulation, and function in three behavioral experiments (21, 20, and 22 participants) and three fMRI experiments (20 participants each) - to explore whether the similarity between objects within each knowledge type impacts behavioral and neural responses while controlling for the other knowledge types. Our findings suggest that an object's visual, functional, and manipulation properties are processed independently in distinct brain areas, including the fusiform gyrus and collateral sulcus, the lateral occipitotemporal cortex, and regions within the dorsal stream. Moreover, object similarity shapes how information is organized within each knowledge type and affects the ability to detect changes between objects. Importantly, the brain may follow a strategy of breaking down the incoming sensory stimulus into different knowledge types and properties in the process of building bottom-up representations that can then serve object recognition. Nevertheless, interacting with objects requires integrating these knowledge types, with our data suggesting that the medial fusiform gyrus and collateral sulcus might be important candidates for this integration. Once integrated, information may be transmitted to parietal and frontal areas to achieve a successful interaction with the object.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.