Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530297›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

From data to decisions: the use of explainable AI to forecast soybean yield in major producing countries.

Xiangyi Wang, Yingbin He, Huicong Chen, Shanjun Luo, Yifan Jiao, Jiong Ning, Anran Feng, Shengnan Han, Yixuan Duan, Sijie Fan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiangyi WangState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yingbin HeState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. heyingbin@caas.cn.
Huicong ChenState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shanjun LuoAerospace Information Research Institute, Henan Academy of Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
Yifan JiaoState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiong NingSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.
Anran FengSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.
Shengnan HanAgricultural Information Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yixuan DuanState Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Sijie FanSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.
Jiyao YinBeidou Research Institute, South China Normal University, Foshan, China.

Funding

Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP) G2025-18-4Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-profit Scientific Institution (G2025-01-29)National Key R&D Program of China "Protection and Utilization of Black Land by Sci-tech Innovation 2023YFD1500200National Natural Science Foundation of China "Study on temporally and spatially precise assessment on potato cultivation suitability based on dynamic process-oriented mode 41771562Special Fund for Fundamental Research of Central Public‑Interest Research Institutions 1610132024008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate crop yield estimation is vital for global food security and trade. Despite the superior performance of deep learning (DL) models, their "black box" nature undermines trust in critical decision-making. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) improves transparency and interactivity, but the ability of XAI models to balance interpretability and predictive accuracy remains insufficiently assessed, limiting their broader application in real-world scenarios. This study proposes the XAI-Crop framework and, using major soybean-producing countries as case studies and a multi-country comparative experimental design, employs multi-source data to evaluate and compare the performance differences between the inherently interpretable DL model-Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN)-and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) as well as Random Forest (RF) models. In small-sample settings, KAN achieves predictive accuracy and generalization comparable to MLP and RF while offering improved interpretability. Feature importance analysis reveals significant regional variability in yield-driving factors, with solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) consistently emerging as a highly sensitive predictor across all regions. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of XAI approaches, such as KAN, in bridging the gap between model accuracy and interpretability, paving the way for their integration into agricultural decision-support systems and contributing to sustainable agricultural development.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCrops, AgriculturalGlycine maxDeep LearningForecastingMultilayer PerceptronsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestDeep learningKolmogorov–Arnold networksMLPRandom forestXAI

Identifiers

PMID41530297
PMCPMC12877059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.