ArticleCommunications medicine2026
A deep learning model for the diagnosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances, comparative performance, and data requirements of artificial intelligence-assisted technologies for the diagnosis of gastric cancer.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (G-NEC) presents with clinical and pathological features that closely resemble those of gastric adenocarcinoma (GC), often complicating differential diagnosis. However, G-NEC is markedly more aggressive and associated with a significantly poorer prognosis, necessitating accurate and timely identification to guide appropriate therapeutic interventions.
methodsIn response to this clinical need, we developed G-NECNet, a deep convolutional neural network tailored to detect G-NEC from histopathological whole-slide images.
resultsThe model demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance, yielding an average area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.993 in the internal validation cohort, 0.985 on an external single-institutional dataset, and 1.000 on an external multi-institutional consultation dataset. These consistently high AUROC values highlight the robustness, accuracy, and generalizability of G-NECNet across diverse clinical settings.
conclusionsThe integration of G-NECNet into routine diagnostic workflows may not only improve the precision of G-NEC classification but also reduce misdiagnosis-related healthcare costs, offering a practical and scalable solution for clinical application.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.