Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530273›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Stacking ensemble machine learning for predicting photodetector performance under varying illumination intensities.

Ali Öter, Zeynep Berktaş, Betül Ersöz, Şeref Sağıroğlu, Elif Orhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ali ÖterDepartment of Electronics and Automation, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, 46030, Turkey.
Zeynep BerktaşElectrical-Electronics Engineering, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, 06050, Turkey.
Betül ErsözDepartment of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education, Gazi University, Ankara, 06500, Turkey.
Şeref Sağıroğlu *Department of Computer Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, 06500, Turkey. ss@gazi.edu.tr.
Elif Orhan *Department of Physics, Gazi University, Ankara, 06500, Turkey. eliforhan@gazi.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photodetectors are essential components in modern optoelectronic technologies, yet experimental characterization of nanomaterial-based devices is often time-consuming and resource-intensive. To address this challenge, this study presents a stacking ensemble learning approach to predict the performance of bismuth-doped graphene quantum dots-based photodetectors under illumination levels ranging from 22 to 110 mW/mm². Four boosting algorithms—Adaptive Boosting, Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Categorical Boosting—were trained on datasets obtained under dark, 22, 66, and 110 mW/mm², while 44 and 88 mW/mm² data were reserved for testing. A stacking ensemble learning model further enhanced prediction accuracy. The final model achieved a coefficient of determination of 0.9874 and a mean absolute error of 0.1840 at 88 mW/mm², effectively predicting the logarithmic current–voltage characteristics. The model also estimated key photodetector metrics, including sensitivity (1589.27), responsivity (2.389 mA/W), and specific detectivity (1.16 × 10¹⁰ Jones). This study explores the use of a stacking ensemble of four boosting algorithms to model the performance of Bi-GQD/p-Si photodetectors across different illumination levels, offering a data-driven alternative to traditional characterization.

Indexed as

Boosting algorithmsEnsemble learningIllumination intensityMachine learningPhotodetector performanceStacking

Identifiers

PMID41530273
PMCPMC12847784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.