ArticleScientific reports2026
Contrastive learning enhanced MobileMamba for real time industrial defect detection on edge devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Industrial metal defect detection is difficult to run in real time on edge devices with limited computing power. To solve this problem, we propose a new lightweight detection network based on Mamba for industrial defect detection applications. Firstly, we designed a MobileMamba backbone network, which includes a Mamba network with temporal characteristics and a focus on global features. Moreover, we adopted a multi-scale approach to further stimulate the characteristics of Mamba and enhance the feature extraction ability of the model. We also add a contrastive auxiliary loss function on the basis of model training to compare the differences between foreground features and background features, as well as the differences between real labels and negative samples. We also defined the difficult negative samples and the easy negative samples, and used the negative samples with the top K% similarity as the difficult negative samples to make the model pay more attention to the difficult negative samples during training. Experiments on the NEU-DET, GC10-DET, and APDDD datasets show that the efficiency of our model is higher than that of the detection models at the same level, and our nano model can reason in real time on edge devices with an accuracy rate higher than that at the same level.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.