ArticleScientific reports2026
Five-factor model-based personality profiles in South Korea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to (1) identify personality profiles based on the Five-Factor Model using a large South Korean sample (N = 813,611) and (2) examine their associations with well-being and related variables (e.g., self-esteem, loneliness, subjective social status). Using a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), we identified five personality types: Average, with mid-range scores on all traits; Introverted-Open, with high Openness and low Extraversion and Agreeableness; Introverted-Reactive, with low Conscientiousness and Extraversion and high Neuroticism; Expressive, with high Openness and Extraversion; and Conventional, with low Openness and, to a lesser extent, low Agreeableness and Neuroticism. Membership probabilities for the five personality profiles showed distinct patterns of association with the aforementioned variables, providing further insight into their characteristics. Expressive and Average type membership was associated with only beneficial outcomes, though the magnitude of these associations differed, while the Introverted-Reactive type was linked to lower well-being and various psychological vulnerabilities. The Introverted-Open and Conventional types displayed a nuanced profile, characterized by a combination of both adaptive and maladaptive attributes. These findings build on previous personality typology research by identifying empirically derived profiles in a Korean sample and offer insights for developing targeted, person-centered well-being interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.