ArticleScientific reports2026
Proteomic analysis of endothelial progenitor cells secretome identifies Serpine 1 as a potent regulator of osteogenesis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reprogramming the Aging Type H Vascular Niche via Myeloid Angiogenic Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Mechanisms, Engineering Strategies, and Translational Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) exert potent paracrine effect on bone regeneration, yet the specific protein mediators remain incompletely characterized. Through proteomic profiling of EPC-conditioned medium, we identified eight highly secreted proteins with angiogenic and osteogenic potential and were evaluated in vitro using bone marrow human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and microvascular endothelial cells (HMECs). Proliferation (XTT assay), migration (scratch assay), and osteogenic differentiation (ALP and Alizarin Red staining) were assessed. Serpine-1 significantly increased MSC and HMEC proliferation in a dose-dependent manner and enhanced osteogenic differentiation. Migration was primarily driven by platelet-derived growth factor subunit B (PDGFB) and BMP2. Based on its dual bioactivity, Serpine-1 was encapsulated in PLGA microspheres embedded in a collagen scaffold (Col-Micro-Serpine) and applied to 4-mm calvarial defects in mice (C57BL/6JOIaHsd, Female, 6 weeks old, 20-25 g). Defects filled with collagen and empty microspheres (Col-Micro) served as control. Micro-CT analysis revealed significantly enhanced bone volume (0.036 ± 0.033, 0.003 ± 0.003 mm3, p < 0.01), BV/TV ratio (2.71 ± 2.91, 0.24 ± 0.27%, p < 0.05), bone density (0.78 ± 0.68, 0.13 ± 0.11 1/mm, p < 0.01 ), and trabecular thickness (0.01 ± 0.05, 0.04 ± 0.04 mm, p < 0.05) in Col-Micro-Serpine versus Col- Micro groups respectively. De novo bone formation within the defect center was observed exclusively in the Col-Micro-Serpine group. This study establishes Serpine-1 as a previously unrecognized osteogenic cue and presents a novel sustained-delivery platform for its application in bone regeneration. These findings offer new insights into cell-free regenerative strategies and highlight Serpine-1 as a promising therapeutic target in skeletal tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.