ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel vision transformer model produces clock drawing test scores as accurate as expert human coders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease and related dementias is a growing public health concern. The clock-drawing test, where subjects draw a clock, typically with hands showing 11:10, has been widely used for dementia screening. A limitation of including the clock-drawing test in large-scale studies is that it requires manual coding, which could result in biases if coders interpret and implement coding rules differently. This study created and evaluated an intelligent Clock Scoring system built with deep learning neural networks to automatically code clock-drawing images. We used a large, publicly available repository of clock-drawing images from the 2011-2019 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) and compared three advanced DLNN methods - ResNet101, EfficientNet and Vision Transformers - in coding clock-drawing images into binary and ordinal (0 to 5) scores. Unlike the traditional nominal classification approach, which treats all categories as unordered (e.g., cats and dogs), we introduced structured ordering into the coding system, which recognizes that higher scores reflect better representation of the clock than lower scores. We also compared deep learning-coded clock images with manual coding, using expert coding as the benchmark to evaluate accuracy. Results suggest that Vision Transformers achieves clock scoring accuracy comparable to expert human coders (weighted kappa = 0.81), outperforming both ResNet101 and EfficientNet (weighted kappa = 0.56-0.73). The ordinal coding system has the ability to allow researchers to minimize either under- or over-estimation errors. Our Vision Transformer-based coding system has been used in NHATS' annual clock-coding since 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.