Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530243›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Factors influencing the progression of post-mortem changes between scene and autopsy.

Nina Lanzinger, Marcel A Verhoff, Christoph G Birngruber, Lena Lutz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nina LanzingerInstitute of Legal Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Kennedyallee 104, D-60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. ninalanzinger@gmail.com.
Marcel A VerhoffInstitute of Legal Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Kennedyallee 104, D-60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christoph G BirngruberInstitute of Legal Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Kennedyallee 104, D-60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Lena LutzInstitute of Legal Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Kennedyallee 104, D-60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temperature is a pivotal factor influencing the progression of the decomposition process of a human cadaver and thus its post-mortem changes. In cases of advanced decomposition, various problems arise in routine forensic work, such as difficulties in estimating the time or cause of death. To understand and evaluate the impact of temperature and other related factors on the progression of post-mortem changes between the post-mortem examination and autopsy, 135 dead bodies with different post-mortem intervals (PMI) and varying storage times between discovery and autopsy were examined. The Total Decomposition Score (TDS) and the Total Body Score (TBS) were used to assess and compare the post-mortem changes, while continuous temperature measurements were taken inside the body bags throughout the cooling phase. It was found that the most important factors leading to an increased progression of the post-mortem changes were a high initial body temperature, few post-mortem changes (low TDS/TBS scores) present at the beginning of the cooling period, insect infestation of a body, and a prolonged duration of the storage period. The establishment of uniform standards for the cooling of bodies in Germany, as well as the recognition and appropriate treatment of cases with an increased risk of rapid progression of the post-mortem changes during the cooling period, has the potential to improve the preservation of forensic evidence.

Indexed as

Forensic PathologyPostmortem ChangesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyBody TemperatureCadaverFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedTemperatureTime FactorsCooling periodDecompositionPost-Mortem interval (PMI)Total body score (TBS)Total decomposition score (TDS)

Identifiers

PMID41530243
PMCPMC12804799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.