ArticleScientific reports2026
Voice-controlled autonomous navigation for smart wheelchairs using ROS-based SLAM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A review of full-stack autonomous obstacle avoidance for assistive robots for the disabled.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smart wheelchairs have the potential to significantly improve autonomy for individuals with severe motor impairments, yet existing systems often exhibit limited speech robustness, insufficient handling of dynamic environments, and a lack of rigorously validated safety mechanisms. This work presents a fully integrated, voice-controlled smart wheelchair that advances assistive mobility through three main contributions. First, we introduce an inclusive speech-recognition module built from a fine-tuned deep learning model trained on a custom dataset that incorporates recordings from users with mild speech impairments. This adaptation improves robustness to non-standard pronunciation and maintains reliable command execution under realistic noise conditions (70-75 dB), achieving a Word Error Rate of 6.7% in quiet environments. Second, rather than proposing a new SLAM method, we develop a system-level navigation framework that optimally integrates 2D LiDAR-based SLAM (GMapping), AMCL localization, and a dual-level voice-command interface within a real-time coordination layer. This includes a quantitatively parameterized safety module featuring adaptive speed modulation and experimentally calibrated emergency-stop thresholds, ensuring reliable operation in dynamic indoor environments. Third, we conduct an extensive experimental campaign in both simulation and real-world conditions to provide a reproducible and quantitative evaluation of system performance. Tests involving dynamic obstacles (pedestrians, wheeled carts, small animals), constrained passages, and diverse acoustic settings demonstrate a mean localization error below 10 cm, a 94% goal-completion rate, and an end-to-end voice-to-motion latency of 0.8 s. Together, these contributions provide a low-cost, experimentally validated assistive-mobility platform that emphasizes inclusive voice interaction, robust real-time navigation, and safety-aware behavior. The proposed framework moves beyond component-level studies by offering a coherent, deployable, and reproducible solution for everyday indoor environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.