Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530215›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Joint processing technology of laser radar and optical image for power distribution.

Liangshuai Liu, Ze Chen, Zhenfei Huo, Haiyan Feng, Yaya Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liangshuai LiuState Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China. liuliangshuai214@163.com.
Ze ChenState Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China.
Zhenfei HuoState Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China.
Haiyan FengState Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China.
Yaya LvState Grid Hebei Electric Power Research Institute, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the unpredictability of loads and the complexity of fault propagation, modern power distribution networks require advanced technologies for fault identification and localization. In traditional systems, there is a high rate of false alarms, slow response times, and limited precision. For fault identification, the Multimodal Deep Feature Hybrid Deep Learning Model (MDF-HDL) utilizes LiDAR, optical images, and sensor data. This model was developed to help overcome these obstacles. The model utilizes deep learning layers to provide elaborate, multimodal feature representations. Additionally, Kalman filtering is used to enhance feature fusion. Classification results can be refined using decision trees, which are optimized using the Adam algorithm. This helps to reduce mistake rates. Through the use of GIS mapping, faults are precisely identified, facilitating efficient maintenance planning. While maintaining a low computational complexity, the MDF-HDL model, implemented in Python, achieves an accuracy of 98.91%, a precision of 98.7%, a recall of 98.3%, an F1-score of 98.5%, and an inference time of 12.5 milliseconds. Through the incorporation of multimodal data and sophisticated algorithms, the system is able to transcend standard constraints, guaranteeing fault management that is both dependable and effective in complicated grid contexts.

Indexed as

Adam optimization and data fusionDeep learningFault localizationGIS mappingKalman filteringPower distribution networks

Identifiers

PMID41530215
PMCPMC12804842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.