Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530210›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A machine learning-based short-term forecasting method for heavy fog in Anhui Province of China.

Yan Sun, Chuanhui Wang, Yeqing Yao, Fei Wang, Jianping Zhou, Xiang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan SunAnhui Public Meteorological Service Center, No.16 Shihe Road, Hefei, 230031, China.
Chuanhui WangAnhui Public Meteorological Service Center, No.16 Shihe Road, Hefei, 230031, China. wang_chh@aliyun.com.
Yeqing YaoAnhui Public Meteorological Service Center, No.16 Shihe Road, Hefei, 230031, China.
Fei WangAnhui Public Meteorological Service Center, No.16 Shihe Road, Hefei, 230031, China.
Jianping ZhouAnhui Public Meteorological Service Center, No.16 Shihe Road, Hefei, 230031, China.
Xiang WangAnhui Public Meteorological Service Center, No.16 Shihe Road, Hefei, 230031, China.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 42075188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on hourly observations from expressway meteorological stations across Anhui Province and the fifth-generation atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) spanning from January 2011 to December 2023, 340 typical cases of regional heavy fog in Anhui Province were identified. The rotated empirical orthogonal function (REOF) method was then employed to objectively divide the province into seven distinct fog zones. Using five categories of forecasting factors (local water vapor, thermodynamics, stability, temporal variations, and upstream-downstream effects), heavy fog forecasting models were developed based on multiple machine learning algorithms, including random forest (RF), logistic regression, K-nearest neighbors, Gaussian Naive Bayes, and decision tree. With daily meteorological observations at 1600 Beijing Standard Time (BST) and corresponding ECMWF forecast data as inputs, the models generated forecasts for fog occurrence from 20 BST on the same day to 08 BST the following day. The results indicate that Anhui Province can be objectively categorized into seven fog zones using the REOF approach. All five machine learning algorithms demonstrated skill in short-term heavy fog forecasting, with the RF algorithm achieving the highest threat score (TS) and accuracy. Water vapor, thermodynamic conditions, and upstream-downstream effects were identified as the most important predictors for the RF model. Consequently, the RF model was selected as the preferred forecasting method and was further evaluated using operational data from 2023. Comparative analysis against visibility forecasts from ECMWF and the National Meteorological Centre's gridded forecast guidance product (SCMOC) showed that the RF-based model achieved the highest TS values and the lowest missing alarm rates across all seven fog zones. Although the false alarm rates of the RF model were lower than those of SCMOC, they were slightly higher than those of ECMWF.

Indexed as

Random forestsShort-term heavy fog forecastsTreat scoreUpstream and downstream effects

Identifiers

PMID41530210
PMCPMC12804685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.