Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530192›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Improving rectal tumor segmentation with anomaly fusion derived from anatomical inpainting: a multicenter study.

Lishan Cai, Mohamed A Abdelatty, Luyi Han, Doenja M J Lambregts, Joost van Griethuysen, Eduardo Pooch, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Sean Benson, Joren Brunekreef, Jonas Teuwen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lishan CaiDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohamed A AbdelattyDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luyi HanDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Doenja M J LambregtsDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost van GriethuysenDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eduardo PoochDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Regina G H Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sean BensonDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joren Brunekreef *Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jonas Teuwen *Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.teuwen@nki.nl.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 857894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate rectal tumor segmentation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is paramount for effective treatment planning. It allows for volumetric and other quantitative tumor assessments, potentially aiding in prognostication and treatment response evaluation. Manual delineation of rectal tumors and surrounding structures is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Over the past few years, deep learning has shown strong results in automated tumor segmentation in MRI. Current studies on automated rectal tumor segmentation, however, focus solely on tumoral regions without considering the rectal anatomical entities and often lack a solid multicenter external validation. In this study, we improved rectal tumor segmentation by incorporating anomaly maps derived from anatomical inpainting. This inpainting was trained using a U-Net-based model and trained to reconstruct a healthy rectum and mesorectum from prostate T2-weighted images (T2WI). The rectal anomaly maps were generated from the difference between the original rectal and reconstructed pseudo-healthy slices. The derived anomaly maps were used in the downstream tumor segmentation tasks by fusing them as an additional input channel (AAnnUNet). Alternative methods for integrating rectal anatomical knowledge were evaluated as baselines, including Multi-Target nnUNet (MTnnUNet), which added rectum and mesorectum segmentation as auxiliary tasks, and Multi-Channel nnUNet (MCnnUNet), which utilized rectum and mesorectum masks as additional input channels. As part of this study, we benchmarked nine models for rectal tumor segmentation on a large multicenter (num = 705) dataset of preoperative T2WI and nnUNet outperformed the other eight models on the external test. The MTnnUNet demonstrated improvements in both fully-supervised and mixed-supervised settings where human-annoated tumor masks and AI-generated rectum and mesoretum masks were used compared to nnUNet, while the MCnnUNet showed benefits only in the setting where mixed-supervision were used. Importantly, anomaly maps were strongly associated with tumoral regions, and their integration within AAnnUNet led to the best tumor segmentation results across both settings. The effectiveness of AAnnUNet demonstrated the value of the anomaly maps, indicating a promising direction for improving rectal tumor segmentation and model robustness for multicenter data.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingRectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningHumansMaleRectum

Identifiers

PMID41530192
PMCPMC12800309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.