ArticleNature communications2026
Evolutionary dynamics of sex determination in Branchiostoma belcheri driven by repeated transposition of a single novel gene.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex determination systems display striking evolutionary flexibility, yet the mechanisms underlying their transitions remain poorly understood. Using newly generated genome assemblies, we investigated the evolving sex-determining system in the amphioxus Branchiostoma belcheri. We identified two female-specific sex-determining regions (SDRs) on chromosome 13, both derived from independent transpositions of the autosomal gene tesD, which shows testis-specific expression in amphioxus species. CRISPR/Cas9 knockout experiments in Branchiostoma floridae confirmed that tesD functions as a male-determination gene, with loss of function producing an all-female phenotype. In B. belcheri, the older SDR (tesDwa) inserted into the coding region of twai, while the younger SDR (tesDwb), flanked by active Zator-1 transposons, inserted into the 3' UTR of vps9c and later translocated to autosomes in ~10% of individuals. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that W-linked tesDwa and tesDwb produce antisense long non-coding RNAs that likely suppress tesD transcription in females, whereas autosomal tesDwb is not expressed and appears non-functional. The insertion sites and co-transcription with host genes suggest promoter hijacking. Together, these findings demonstrate that recurrent transpositions can generate new functional SDRs that coexist with older ones, driving dynamic turnover of sex determination in B. belcheri.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.