ArticleNature communications2026
Mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 resistance to nucleotide analog-based antivirals.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Drug Resistance and Rational Design of Anti-Resistant Antivirals.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The nucleoside analog CMX521 inhibits coronavirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase via a two-pronged mechanism.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The remarkable ability of SARS-CoV-2 to resist many nucleotide analog (NA)-based antivirals represents a formidable challenge to therapeutic efforts. Here, we reveal fundamental insights into how its unique proofreading exoribonuclease (ExoN) counteracts two representative NA antivirals, bemnifosbuvir and sofosbuvir, which are designed to inhibit the viral RNA polymerase (RdRp). Our findings unveil that NA incorporation alters RNA-binding dynamics, significantly increasing the affinity of RNA to ExoN while weakening its interaction with RdRp. This shift likely facilitates RNA dissociation from RdRp, subsequent recognition by ExoN, and excision of NAs. Strikingly, we elucidate the mechanism underlying varied levels of resilience of different NAs to ExoN excision. Our cryo-EM structures of ExoN in complex with either of the two NA-incorporated RNAs reveal previously unknown ExoN-NA interactions mediated by the functional groups on the modified ribose rings of NAs, illuminating the key determinants of their recognition and excision. Furthermore, we identify an allosteric regulatory loop of ExoN that promotes the full activation of ExoN but is displaced by the binding of NAs exhibiting resilience to ExoN excision. These discoveries provide a molecular framework for understanding SARS-CoV-2 resistance to NA-based antivirals and highlight mechanisms that could be exploited to improve anti-coronavirus drug design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.