Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530095›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Chemical Society2026

Allosteric PROTACs: Expanding the Horizon of Targeted Protein Degradation.

Aileen Frost, Suzanne O'Connor, Alessio Ciulli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Supramolecular Degraders: An Emerging Paradigm in Targeted Protein Degradation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Phosphatase Signaling as a Therapeutic Strategy in Schizophrenia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aileen FrostCentre for Targeted Protein Degradation, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5JJ, United Kingdom.
Suzanne O'ConnorCentre for Targeted Protein Degradation, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5JJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2569-0338
Alessio CiulliCentre for Targeted Protein Degradation, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5JJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8654-1670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) have transformed the concept of chemical intervention in biological systems by co-opting the ubiquitin-proteasome system to selectively degrade proteins. A key promise of this modality is that proximity alone─not inhibition─is required, allowing binding anywhere on the protein surface to trigger degradation. Yet despite this conceptual freedom, most PROTACs to date have been built from orthosteric inhibitors. The use of allosteric or functionally silent ligands remains a largely untapped opportunity. In this Perspective, we spotlight pioneering efforts in allosteric PROTAC design and explore how such strategies could unlock improved outcomes for target selectivity, efficacy, and resistance management while also modulating physicochemical properties to enhance in vivo performance. We further discuss the practical and conceptual challenges and the advances needed to make allosteric targeting a mainstream strategy in the design of protein degraders and other proximity-inducing molecules.

Indexed as

ProteinsProteolysisAllosteric RegulationHumansLigandsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteolysis Targeting ChimeraUbiquitinLigandsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteinsProteolysis Targeting ChimeraUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID41530095
PMCPMC12856895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.