Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41530087›Full record

ReviewSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2026

[Research progress of molecular imprinting technology in the field of disease diagnosis and therapy].

Ran Zhu, Gan-Ping Cai, Hai-Jiao Zheng, Qiong Jia

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ran ZhuCollege of Chemistry,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China.
Gan-Ping CaiCollege of Chemistry,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China.
Hai-Jiao ZhengCollege of Chemistry,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China.
Qiong JiaCollege of Chemistry,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease biomarkers play important roles in modern medicine, enabling early disease diagnosis, precise subtyping, prognostic evaluation, and targeted therapy. Conventional biorecognition elements, such as antibodies and aptamers, offer high specificity but suffer from inherent limitations, including high production costs, instability in complex biological matrices, and significant batch-to-batch variation. Collectively, these constraints restrict their scalability and versatility for high-throughput, cost-effective, and multi-scenario clinical applications. Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), prepared via molecular imprinting technology (MIT), have emerged as highly robust and promising synthetic receptors. During their formation, functional monomers assemble around a target molecule, and highly specific binding sites are formed after polymerization and template removal. MIPs exhibit a unique combination of advantages, ranging from cost-effectiveness to high selectivity, as well as high affinity comparable to natural counterparts, and outstanding physicochemical stability under harsh conditions. Driven by their highly flexible and customizable design capabilities, MIP development has witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years. These polymers are suitable for analyzing different types of disease biomarkers, ranging from proteins, peptides, and saccharides to complex biological entities such as whole cells and extracellular vesicles. Moreover, MIPs can be functionally engineered to integrate signal transduction or stimuli-responsive features, facilitating the creation of intelligent biomedical platforms. This review systematically summarizes the progress in applying MIT for disease diagnostics and therapeutics. It first elaborates on diverse imprinting techniques specifically tailored for different biomarker classes, including proteins, peptides, saccharides, cells, and extracellular vesicles. Subsequently, the article provides a comprehensive overview of their applications in diagnostics, encompassing biosensing, bioimaging, and bioseparation, as well as therapeutic applications, including drug delivery, photothermal and photodynamic therapy, biotoxin removal, and cell behavior regulation. Additionally, critical challenges hindering clinical translation are discussed, such as biocompatibility, long-term toxicity, high large-scale manufacturing costs, and the lack of standardized clinical validation protocols. Finally, promising future directions are outlined, emphasizing the development of biodegradable materials, integration with artificial intelligence, and adoption of green synthesis strategies. These synergistic approaches are expected to stimulate innovation, enabling the safe, reliable, and scalable translation of MIPs into real-world biomedical and clinical applications. In summary, MIPs represent a versatile, robust, and economically viable alternative to conventional biorecognition elements. Their customizable nature, combined with functional engineering capabilities, positions MIPs as a promising technology in disease diagnosis and therapy. Future efforts focusing on clinical translation, sustainability, and intelligent platform integration are likely to accelerate their adoption across diverse biomedical fields.

Indexed as

Molecular ImprintingBiomarkersHumansMolecularly Imprinted PolymersBiomarkersMolecularly Imprinted Polymersdiagnosticsdisease biomarkersmolecular imprinting technology (MIT)molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs)therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID41530087
PMCPMC12801124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.