ReviewPractical neurology2026
How to diagnose papilloedema.
Review in Practical neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Papilloedema is optic disc swelling due to raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Typically, this occurs bilaterally, and visual function is usually relatively preserved unless the disease is moderately severe or chronic. The implications of a new finding of papilloedema are potentially serious; however, overdiagnosis of papilloedema can lead to iatrogenic harm from unnecessary investigation or treatment. It is important to consider the differential diagnosis for swollen optic disc appearances to ensure patients are investigated appropriately. We describe an approach to the clinical assessment of patients with suspected papilloedema, using history, examination and tools available in the eye clinic including perimetry and optical coherence tomography, as well as the pitfalls that may be encountered using these technologies. We also discuss a strategy for subsequent investigation of patients with probable papilloedema to identify causes of raised ICP, while highlighting potential pitfalls in this process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.