ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026
Merkel cell carcinoma immunotherapy: key questions in the era of immune checkpoint blockade.
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) exemplifies the paradigm of immunogenic tumors that nonetheless develop sophisticated immune evasion mechanisms. This is in line with the observation that MCC exhibits remarkable susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with responses in approximately half of patients with advanced disease in the first-line setting. However, 40-50% of patients show primary ICI resistance, while 20-30% of patients develop acquired ICI resistance on initial disease control. Still, the advent of ICI therapy represents a revolutionary rather than evolutionary advance in MCC management, fundamentally transforming outcomes from the dismal prognosis associated with conventional chemotherapy to durable responses extending substantially beyond 2 years. Still, important questions remain: (1) Is programmed cell death protein-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 inhibition more effective? (2) How long should ICI treatment continue? (3) What is the best choice of salvage therapy for patients with primary or acquired ICI resistance? (4) Which combination regimens can increase the share of patients benefiting from ICI? (5) Which patient/tumor characteristics predict response and its duration? Finally, (6) which timing of ICI therapy, that is, the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or therapeutic setting, offers the optimal overall outcomes for patients with MCC? A number of recent studies provide initial, but unfortunately not yet definitive answers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.