Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41529873›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Specialist PrE-hospital rEDirection for ischaemic stroke thrombectomY (SPEEDY): study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial with included health economic and process evaluations.

Lisa Shaw, Michael Allen, Jo Day, Gary A Ford, Martin James, Graham McClelland, Peter McMeekin, Helen Mossop, Catherine J Pope, Rosemary L Simmonds and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lisa ShawStroke Research Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK lisa.shaw@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3435-9519
Michael AllenHealth and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8746-9957
Jo DayHealth and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5164-3036
Gary A FordOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Martin JamesRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Graham McClellandDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Peter McMeekinDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Helen MossopBiostatistics Research Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Catherine J PopeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rosemary L SimmondsHealth and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Phil WhiteStroke Research Group, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Nina WilsonBiostatistics Research Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5908-1720
Christopher I PriceStroke Research Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcome from large vessel occlusion stroke can be significantly improved by time-critical thrombectomy but treatment is only available in regional comprehensive stroke centres (CSCs). Many patients are first admitted to a local primary stroke centre (PSC) and require transfer to a CSC, which delays treatment and decreases the chance of a good outcome. Access to thrombectomy might be improved if eligible patients could be identified in the prehospital setting and selectively redirected to a CSC. This study is evaluating a new specialist prehospital redirection pathway intended to facilitate access to thrombectomy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with included health economic and process evaluations. Clusters are ambulance stations (or teams) which are work bases for ambulance practitioners. Intervention allocated ambulance practitioners use the Specialist PrE-hospital rEDirection for ischaemic stroke thrombectomY ('SPEEDY') pathway which comprises initiation according to specific criteria followed by contact with CSC staff who undertake a remote assessment to select patients for direct CSC admission. Control allocated ambulance practitioners continue to provide standard care which comprises admission to a local PSC and transfer to a CSC for thrombectomy if required. A co-primary outcome of thrombectomy treatment rate and time from stroke symptom onset to thrombectomy treatment will evaluate the impact of the pathway. Secondary outcomes include key aspects of emergency care including prehospital/hospital time intervals, receipt of other treatments including thrombolysis, and performance characteristics of the pathway. A broad population of all ambulance practitioner suspected and confirmed stroke patients across participating regions is being enrolled with a consent waiver. Data about SPEEDY pathway delivery are captured onto a study case record form, but all other data are obtained from routine healthcare records. Powered on a 'primary analysis population' (ischaemic stroke patients with pathway initiation criteria), 894 participants will detect an 8.4% difference in rate and data from 564 thrombectomy procedures will detect a 30 minute difference in time to treatment. The full study population is estimated to be approximately 80 000. Regression modelling will be used to examine primary and secondary outcomes in several analysis populations. The economic analyses will include cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, and calculation of willingness to pay at a range of accepted threshold values. The process evaluation involves semi-structured interviews with professionals and patient/family members to explore views and experiences about the SPEEDY pathway. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has ethical, Health Research Authority and participating NHS Trust approvals.Dissemination of study results will include presentations at national and international conferences and events, publication in peer-reviewed journals, and plain English summaries for patient/public engagement activities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN77453332.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesIschemic StrokeThrombectomyAmbulancesCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime-to-TreatmentRandomized Controlled TrialSTROKE MEDICINETreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41529873
PMCPMC12815104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.