Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41529762›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology2026

Cloneable contrast across all biological length scales.

Kanda M Borgognoni, Bradley F Guilliams, Zachary J Butz, Christopher J Ackerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kanda M BorgognoniDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA.
Bradley F GuilliamsDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Zachary J ButzDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Christopher J AckersonDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Electronic address: ackerson@colostate.edu.

Funding

Clonable NanoparticlesR01GM137139 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher Jeffries Ackerson · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM137139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cloneable contrast in biological microscopy is exemplified by Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) in fluorescence microscopy. There are no similarly useful cloneable contrast agents that function in biological electron microscopy. This paper reports a cloneable Selenium NanoParticle (cSeNP) that produces molecular contrast in imaging modalities including cellular electron microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, and X-ray computed tomography. This set of imaging modalities can image all biologically relevant length scales, from subcellular structure to whole organisms. The cSeNP is a ∼5 nm diameter Selenium nanoparticle that is made and conjugated by a protein. Because the cSeNP is electron dense compared to biological molecules, it has high contrast in biological electron microscopy. DNA encoding the cSeNP protein was concatenated to DNA encoding FtsZ, the procaryotic analog of tubulin. FtsZ is membrane associated throughout the cell cycle and localizes to the cleavage furrow of dividing cells. Escherichia coli cells expressing FtsZ-cSeNP fusion proteins were examined by transmission electron tomography and fluorescence light microscopy. These experiments show cSeNP decorated FtsZ filaments and/or cSeNPs in locations that correlate to known FtsZ locations, with less than 5% of cSeNPs in unexpected locations. X-ray imaging shows contrast attributable to cSeNPs is distinguishable from background in E. coli. The cSeNP, therefore, represents a cloneable imaging contrast agent that facilitates location and correlation of proteins-of-interest across all biological length scales. This is especially useful in biological electron microscopy, where larger-area imaging modalities such as fluorescence microscopy are employed to identify sub-areas containing a protein-of-interest to prepare for electron microscopy study.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaNanoparticlesBacterial ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsEscherichia coliMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopy, FluorescenceSeleniumTomography, X-Ray ComputedBacterial ProteinsContrast MediaCytoskeletal ProteinsFtsZ protein, BacteriaSeleniumCell imagingCloneable selenium nanoparticle tagCorrelative light and electron microscopy and X-ray tomographyElectron tomography/microscopyIn situ electron contrastProtein tagging

Identifiers

PMID41529762
PMCPMC13020549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.