Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41529191›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2026

Community College Transfer Students' Pathways Through Boundary Experiences Using a Storied Science Identity Lens.

Paul T Le, Sarah T Hug, Laurel M Hartley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul T LeDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204.
Sarah T HugColorado Evaluation and Research Consulting, Westminster, CO 80021.
Laurel M HartleyDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community college transfer students have varied experiences that may (dis)engage them with science over their lifespan. Through the lens of science identity and boundary experiences, we completed three interviews, each with five transfer students majoring in biology at a four-year university. Students reflected on their entire lives and imparted stories about formal and informal experiences that impacted their (dis)engagement with science and explained their pathway in science. We focus on the boundary experiences students described and how these may or may not support science identity production. We found that boundary experiences vary by context and that the actions and words of individuals who are a part of the story play a role in the consequences of the boundary experience. We noted that different boundary experiences have different impacts on the trajectory of a student and that their agency influences possible trajectories. The stories imparted articulate not only barriers, but the resources that uplifted them in their lifetime. This provides insight into the varied science experiences that community college transfer students encounter and decisions that students make that educators can leverage. The constant negotiations with new experiences allowed for a continuous science identity production that resulted in persistence, even with interruptions.

Indexed as

ScienceStudentsAcademiaHumansSocial GroupUniversities

Identifiers

PMID41529191
PMCPMC12930256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.