ArticleThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres2026
Centring Social Justice in Nursing Educational Resources: Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion.
Article in The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purposeOpen educational resources (OER) are socially progressive learning resources that are well positioned to disrupt the exclusionary and marginalizing processes that can sometimes occur within nursing texts. Recognizing the social justice underpinnings of OER, the study focus was to examine how leadership teams should integrate equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) into the design and production of nursing-related OER.Methods and proceduresThis study was theoretically informed by the concept of Othering. The interpretive descriptive methodology involved reflexive and critical dialogue with focus group data that honed skeptical thinking and encouraged the search for alternative ways to think about how codes and themes were named and conceptualized.FindingsParticipating in the two hour focus group were nine leaders, who were authors of two nursing-related OER. Participants included six nurse educators, one educational developer, and two students. Three themes were identified including: diversifying design and production; centring social justice; and nuancing inclusion.Discussion and conclusionPart of the blueprint to the design and production of OER that are shaped by EDI must include incredibly rich, vibrant, and diverse voices and teams who are focused on social justice. This approach offers ways to create space for the beauty of human difference, the nuances of inclusion, and the flourishing and growth of learners. Although we may never produce resources that fully embrace inclusion and belonging, we are confident that diverse and critical voices will shift us closer while centring social justice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.