ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Patient perspectives and barriers to effective home-based care in lymphatic filariasis: A mixed methods study from Puducherry, India.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Morbidity Management and Disability Prevention (MMDP) remain an under-addressed component of lymphatic filariasis elimination. Despite the simplicity of the hygiene-based regimen, adherence to these practices remains low due to multiple barriers, exacerbating chronic suffering. As the primary role remains vested in the patients, this study explores their perspectives and barriers to home-based care to inform strategies to improve outcomes. This study employed a mixed-methods approach using an explanatory sequential design. The quantitative phase involved a cross-sectional survey of 321 adult patients from Puducherry and adjacent areas of Tamil Nadu, utilising a validated questionnaire informed by the Self-Management Assessment Scale (SeMaS) framework. The qualitative phase comprised 12 in-depth interviews (IDIs) and four focus group discussions (FGDs), with participants evenly distributed based on gender and health-seeking behaviours, and the data were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. Only 46.4% of participants regularly practised home-based limb care. Morbidity management scores were significantly higher among patients with an income (p = 0.005) and regular healthcare visits (p < 0.001), and lower among those with grade 4 lymphedema (p < 0.001). Participants under 60 years (p < 0.001), women (p = 0.015), and those with higher grades of lymphedema (p < 0.001) perceived a higher disease burden. Key barriers pertaining to home-based care were identified in social support (84.7%), perceived disease burden (33.0%), and mental health issues (15%). Qualitative findings highlighted the interactions of socioeconomic, structural, and cultural factors, indicating the key role of structural factors alongside individual-level determinants like locus of control, self-efficacy, and emotional well-being. The findings underscore the need for a multifaceted approach that transcends individual-level interventions to include systemic reforms, such as policy integration, capacity building, and community-driven support mechanisms. Addressing the barriers holistically and tailoring the solutions addressing diverse disadvantaged groups can enhance adherence to morbidity management practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.