ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring collaborative strategies to improve patient safety in healthcare organizations: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refinement and Preliminary Validation of the Technological Competency as Caring in Healthcare Instrument (TCCHI): Psychometric Evaluation of a Concise Three-Factor Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Engaging patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) in patient safety in healthcare organisations: a rapid scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient safety remains a critical concern in healthcare, necessitating the exploration of collaborative approaches to enhance care quality and outcomes. This qualitative study delves into the significance of interprofessional collaboration, leadership support, patient engagement, and safety culture in driving patient safety initiatives within healthcare settings.
methodThis qualitative phenomenological approach, involving in-depth interviews and document analysis, was conducted to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals, administrators, patients, policymakers, and researchers involved in patient safety initiatives. Thematic analysis was employed to identify and organize recurring patterns in the data, while interpretive phenomenological analysis was utilized to gain a deeper understanding of participants' lived experiences. This dual approach revealed key themes related to teamwork, communication, leadership, patient engagement, and best practices in patient safety.
resultsThe study revealed that interprofessional collaboration is widely recognized as vital for patient safety, with participants highlighting the importance of effective communication, shared decision-making, and mutual respect among healthcare professionals. Leadership support, organizational structures, and a culture of safety emerged as key enabling factors. Despite the benefits, challenges such as hierarchy, siloed communication, resource constraints, and resistance to change remain significant barriers. Strategies including regular interdisciplinary training, patient engagement initiatives, leveraging technology, and continuous quality improvement processes were identified as effective ways to strengthen collaborative practices.
conclusionPromoting interprofessional collaboration, strong leadership, and a robust safety culture are essential for improving patient safety outcomes. Overcoming systemic and interpersonal barriers requires targeted interventions at both individual and organizational levels, with ongoing education, patient participation, and data-driven feedback playing crucial roles in sustaining collaborative efforts. These insights support the adoption of integrated approaches to foster safer and higher-quality care across healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.