ArticlePloS one2026
A physics-inspired memory-augmented deep learning framework for magnetic core loss prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of magnetic core loss is a key challenge for improving the efficiency and reliability of power electronic systems. Traditional empirical models such as the Steinmetz equation are only applicable to sinusoidal steady-state conditions and struggle with the complex non-sinusoidal waveforms and variable operating conditions in modern power electronics. While existing deep learning methods have shown improvements, they still face fundamental limitations in handling the nonlinear mismatch between B(t) and H(t) waveforms, coupling of multi-scale loss mechanisms, and generalization under extreme operating conditions. This paper proposes an Enhanced Memory Augmented Mamba (EMA-Mamba) model that achieves breakthrough progress in magnetic core loss prediction. It utilizes a state-space memory augmentation mechanism that stores and retrieves typical magnetization patterns through a trainable external memory matrix, endowing the model with a capability similar to the "magnetic memory" of magnetic materials, effectively solving the gradient vanishing problem in long sequence modeling. Combined with an attention-guided intelligent feature selection mechanism, it adaptively identifies critical turning points in hysteresis curves through a Top-K strategy, fundamentally solving the temporal mismatch problem between B(t) and H(t) waveforms. Finally, through a physics-constrained multi-objective optimization framework, it achieves decoupled modeling of hysteresis loss, eddy current loss, and residual loss through loss function combination, overcoming the optimization difficulties caused by data spanning six orders of magnitude. Experiments on the MagNet dataset containing 10 materials and over 150,000 data points show that EMA-Mamba achieves an average prediction error of 4.50% and a coefficient of determination of 99.9947%, reducing error by 34.2% compared to state-of-the-art baseline methods, with a 36.2% reduction in 95th percentile error under extreme conditions. The model demonstrates excellent temperature robustness and cross-material generalization capability, providing a reliable theoretical tool for intelligent design and optimization of magnetic components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.