Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528996›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer screening in a federally qualified health center: Provider and staff perspectives.

Jennifer L Schneider, Jennifer S Rivelli, Anne L Escaron, Rebecca Crocker, Robert Lara, Alexis Rodriguez, Joanna Garcia, Gloria D Coronado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer L SchneiderKaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8525-8873
Jennifer S RivelliKaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Anne L EscaronInstitute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Rebecca CrockerUniversity of Arizona, School of Public Health, Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Robert LaraInstitute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Alexis RodriguezInstitute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Joanna GarciaInstitute for Health Equity, AltaMed Health Services Corporation, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Gloria D CoronadoUniversity of Arizona, School of Public Health, Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated policies discouraging routine-care visits dramatically affected cancer screening in the United States. Yet little is known about the perspectives of providers and staff at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during this period. We administered hour-long telephone interviews with clinic leadership and frontline staff at a Los Angeles-based FQHC. Questions explored barriers and facilitators to CRC screening, and adaptations implemented to address challenges posed during three phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: early (March-July 2020), middle (August - December 2020), and later (January - December 2021). All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and content-analyzed by trained and experienced qualitative methodologists. Participants' (n = 20) ages ranged from 26-56; most were female (85%), and in leadership positions (65%). Early in the pandemic CRC screening efforts were severely hampered as the health center was inundated with upper respiratory infections, lacked infrastructure to rapidly scale telehealth, and had minimal guidance from prior disaster plans geared for short-term challenges (e.g., flu). Limited availability of stool test kits and reduced gastroenterology capacity also thwarted CRC screening delivery. Throughout the pandemic, the FQHC faced challenges hiring and retaining staff for cancer screening outreach. In the later phase of the pandemic, the FQHC responded by expanding CRC screening options, deploying health record tools enabling automated outreach, and retraining staff on CRC screening workflows. Interviewees identified strategies to strengthen pandemic preparedness and sustain CRC screening, including improved monitoring of infectious disease through incoming patient call data to guide staffing decisions, diversifying vendor relationships and specialty care partnerships to ensure access, particularly in gastroenterology, and increasing home-based testing options. Our findings, while limited to the experience of one large FQHC, may help inform efforts to develop guidance that community health centers can apply in responding to future pandemics or other natural disasters to minimize impacts on CRC screening.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCOVID-19Early Detection of CancerAdultFemaleFrontline WorkersHealth PersonnelHumansLos AngelesMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Telemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41528996
PMCPMC12798968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.