Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528974›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2026

Better Inputs, Better Learning: A Peptide Embedding Tutorial for Proteomic Mass Spectrometry.

Luke Squires, Jose Humberto Giraldez Chavez, Alfred Nilsson, Lukas Käll, Samuel H Payne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luke SquiresBiology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, United States.
Jose Humberto Giraldez ChavezBiology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, United States.
Alfred NilssonScience for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm 17165, Sweden.
Lukas KällScience for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm 17165, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5689-9797
Samuel H PayneBiology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8351-1994

Funding

Enhanced Sensitivity and Quantitative Precision for Single Cell ProteomicsR01GM147653 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI PAYNE, SAMUEL H, SHORTREED, MICHAEL R · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM147653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry proteomics creates complex data representing the peptide/protein contents of biological samples. Various types of machine learning have been central to computational methods used to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra and numerous other aspects of the data analysis process. As deep learning has emerged as a powerful machine learning method for modeling and interpreting data, computational proteomics researchers have leveraged large publicly available data sets to train machine learning models to predict peptide fragmentation spectra and liquid chromatography retention time. Resources like proteomicsML offer extensive demonstrative tutorials for these learning tasks and are closing the gap between the proteomics and machine learning communities. However, in these and other educational materials on deep learning, the critical step of preparing data for learning is frequently omitted. Prior to learning, peptide strings must be converted into a numeric format─an embedding. There are many different peptide embeddings, and some vastly outperform others. Yet the process for creating an embedding, and also the rationale for choosing a specific embedding, is rarely discussed in our proteomics literature. In this technical note, we introduce four Google Colab notebooks to teach peptide embeddings. The series walks users through five different peptide-embedding strategies─ from simplistic single-number encodings to state-of-the-art pretrained embeddings─ through both code examples and narrative descriptions. The final notebook compares the five embeddings in a head-to-head benchmark. By making these notebooks free, we hope to lower the barrier for researchers who want to bring modern deep learning into their proteomics workflows.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryHumansMachine LearningPeptidesembeddingencodingmachine learningpeptideproteomics AIproteomics educationtutorials

Identifiers

PMID41528974
PMCPMC12888018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.