ArticlePloS one2026
Biomechanical optimization of iliolumbar fixation strategies for unilateral vertical sacral fractures: Prioritizing stability-mobility balance via finite element analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to optimize iliolumbar fixation strategies for unilateral vertical sacral fractures via finite element analysis, by comparing stability, implant stress, and lumbar mobility to identify the optimal clinical option.
methodsA finite element model of the pelvis and L3-L5 lumbar spine was constructed to simulate four fixation models (L4L5IS, L5S1IS, L5IS, S1IS) under a 600 N vertical load. Sacral vertical displacement, implant stress, and fracture line separation were analyzed.
resultsDouble-segment fixation (L4 + L5 + iliac screw and L5 + S1 + iliac screw) demonstrated superior sacral stability compared to single-segment fixation (L5 + iliac screw and S1 + iliac screw). The L5 + S1 + iliac screw configuration achieved the best balance of stability and lumbar mobility. Stress concentrations were primarily observed at iliac screw connectors, but all models remained within safe mechanical limits.
conclusionsDouble-segment fixation, particularly the L5 + S1 + iliac screw model, is recommended for optimal sacral stability. For cases with compromised S1 pedicles, L4 + L5 + iliac screw fixation is a reliable alternative. Short-segment fixation is viable when prioritizing lumbar mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.