ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Measuring bridging forces in protein-DNA condensates.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Counteraction of HMGB1 at ss-dsDNA junctions maintains liquidity of protamine-DNA co-condensates.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Protein•DNA mesh assembly drives dsDNA-specific and duplex length-dependent activation of cGAS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From chromosomal protein disorder to chromatin phase separation.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2026Review
- Counteraction of HMGB1 at ss-dsDNA junctions maintains liquidity of protamine-DNA co-condensates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-DNA condensates mediate transcription and regulate gene expression and DNA replication and repair. Intermolecular bridging forces stabilizing condensates have direct roles in these processes. Here, we use optical tweezers to measure bridging forces. In the presence of protamine, a single condensate is observed on a 20.5-knt single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Stretching produces force curves with a sawtooth pattern, suggesting condensate disassembly via sequential rupture of individual protamine-ssDNA bridges. The bridging forces are 11.3 ± 4.6 pN, with unfolding lengths of 1.3 ± 0.8 µm per bridge. In contrast, double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) forms protamine-mediated tangles that can withstand strand-separation forces (~60 pN). ssDNA tracks unpeeled at nicks on dsDNA by overstretching seed tangle formation upon retraction, but the initial condensates have a sufficient ssDNA-to-dsDNA ratio to appear liquid-like, as indicated by a sawtooth pattern in subsequent stretching. The presence of dsDNA raises bridging forces to 34 ± 8 pN, which revert to ~10 pN upon adding external ssDNA. In line with these single-molecule results, protamine-dsDNA mixtures form solid-like aggregates and require ssDNA addition to become liquid droplets. Conversely, adding dsDNA slows the fusion of protamine-ssDNA droplets. This work reports systematic characterization of bridging forces and shows that the ssDNA-to-dsDNA ratio can tune their magnitude in protein-DNA condensates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.