ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2026
Building research evidence for advancing prevention and translation: reflecting on a 20-year organizational approach of applied chronic disease preventive health research.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranslating public health research into practice remains challenging despite ongoing focus on evidence-based approaches. This study profiles the scope of research undertaken by the Prevention Research Collaboration (PRC), a university based applied public health research organization, with funding from both traditional academic sources and from policy agencies, and examines how it contributed to a translational, evidence-building approach in chronic disease prevention.
methodsWe analyzed PRC's research output using two complementary approaches: (i) a review of journal articles published from 2018 to 2024 where PRC researchers were lead or senior authors; and (ii) an examination of annual reports and workplans from 2013 to 2023 to identify major research programs. Research was classified according to public health evidence-building typology and whether it was investigator-initiated or policy-initiated.
resultsOverall, investigator-initiated research was dominant amongst journal publications, and particularly showcased problem definition studies. Intervention evaluation, as identified in journal publications and internal documents, was more likely to be policy-initiated. PRC demonstrated a high degree of collaboration with policy and practice professionals (42.5% of investigator-initiated and 50% of policy-initiated publications included policy co-authors). Key research areas across chronic disease prevention included physical activity (40.4% of publications), obesity prevention (14.2%), and tobacco control (12.8%).
conclusionThis case study demonstrates that a small public health research group can successfully navigate the research-policy interface over a sustained period. PRC's continuity of management, staffing and funding arrangements, plus shared agenda and strong partnership with government, are considered to be key enabling factors for this collaborative evidence-building public health approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.