ArticleKidney3602026
Should the Current Zero HLA ABDR-Mismatch Priority in Kidney Allocation System Continue?: A Critical Appraisal.
Article in Kidney360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key pointsZero HLA ABDR mismatch priority in the Kidney Allocation System is highly biased against minority candidates. Zero HLA ABDR mismatch priority shunts 2.5% of O donors to nonidentical blood types disadvantaging O recipients. Zero HLA ABDR-mismatch priority recipients have substantially shorter dialysis exposure before transplant than nonpriority recipients.
backgroundIn the Kidney Allocation System (KAS), adult kidney candidates who are a zero HLA ABDR-mismatch with a potential donor are given priority in the match run over nonzero HLA ABDR-mismatch candidates. Furthermore, KAS allows for the shunting of kidneys to zero-mismatch candidates across compatible ABO blood types, potentially disadvantaging O candidates who have longer waiting times. This study was undertaken to determine who is receiving zero HLA ABDR-mismatch kidneys, the number of donors shunted to nonidentical ABO recipients, the effect on dialysis exposure before transplant, and the current patient and graft outcomes.
methodsAll adult deceased donor kidney recipients since the start of KAS on December 4, 2014, were included in the study. Multiorgan transplants with a kidney, 98%-100% calculated panel reactive antibodies (CPRAs), previous living donors, pediatric, medically urgent, and safety net transplants were excluded. Patients were considered a zero-mismatch allocation if they received a zero HLA ABDR-mismatch kidney and had an allocation CPRA <98%. One hundred twenty-two thousand nine hundred and fifty-one adult deceased donor kidney transplants were in the study population. Six thousand two hundred twenty-eight, or 5.1%, were zero HLA ABDR-mismatch recipients.
resultsThe zero HLA ABDR-mismatch recipients were predominantly of the White race, female, had lower allocation CPRAs, much shorter dialysis exposure, and were more likely to be retransplant recipients. One thousand four hundred and forty-one blood type O donors were shunted to other ABO groups, or 2.46% of O donors. Cox analysis of graft and patient survival showed that zero HLA ABDR-mismatch recipients had a small graft survival advantage (0.898, 0.834 to 0.967, P = 0.004) and no patient survival advantage (0.947, 0.865 to 1.037, P = 0.239). The adjusted graft survival at 7 years was 67% (zero HLA-ABDR mismatch) versus 65% (nonzero HLA-ABDR mismatch).
conclusionsThe current zero HLA ABDR-mismatch priority is highly biased against racial minority recipients, shunts a sizable number of O donors to non-O recipients, only makes a small improvement to organ utility, and should be removed from the allocation priority list.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.