Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528744›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Prevalence of Central Sensitization in Postural Tachycardia Syndrome.

Gabrielle T Mathew, Peter Novak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabrielle T MathewDepartment of Neurology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Peter NovakDepartment of Neurology, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A previous study showed a high prevalence of central sensitization syndrome (CSS) in patients with autonomic symptoms. The prevalence of CSS in postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), a form of dysautonomia, is unknown. Objectives: To analyze the prevalence of CSS in POTS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study included patients with a POTS diagnosis confirmed by autonomic testing at Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital between 2022 and 2025. Data were analyzed from April to August 2025. Exposure: POTS with and without CSS. Main Outcomes and Measures: Central Sensitization Inventory (to assess central sensitization syndrome [CSS]), COMPASS-31 (autonomic symptoms), Neuropathy Total Symptom Score-6 (NTSS-6, sensory symptoms), PROMIS (global health), and autonomic testing (Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing, sudomotor function, and head-up tilt) with skin biopsies. Primary outcome was the central sensitization inventory score with secondary outcomes individual test performances. Results: This study included 305 patients with POTS, of whom 264 (86.6%) met criteria for CSS (mean [SD] age, 33.21 [10.75] years; 30 males [11.4%]; 234 females [88.6%]). Patients with CSS compared with those without CSS had longer duration of symptoms, were more frequently female, exhibited higher rates of anxiety (195 [73.9%] vs 20 [48.8%]; P = .002), depression (168 [63.6% vs 14 [34.1%]; P = .001), fibromyalgia (46 [17.4%] vs 0 [0%]; P = .008), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS, 90 [34.1%] vs 7 [17.1%]; P = .046), headaches (176 [66.7%] vs 12 [29.3 %]; P < .001), treatment with antihistamine medication (136 [51.5%] vs 13 [31.7%]; P = .03), psychiatric medication (163 [61.7%] vs 17 [41.5 %]; P = .02), pain medication (127 [48.1%] vs 8 [19.5%]; P = .001), and gastrointestinal medication (82 [31.1%] vs 5 [12.2 %]; P = .02), and had higher COMPASS-31 scores (51.93 [13.23] vs 31.18 [10.49]; P < .001), NTSS-6 scores (11.32 [4.86] vs 4.44 [3.32]; P < .001), NRS scores (3.26 [2.73] vs 0.54 [1.21]; P < .001), and worse PROMIS scores (20.36 [5.45] vs 27.96 [4.73]; P < .001). Autonomic tests showed lower orthostatic end-tidal carbon dioxide (27.59 [6.39] mm HG vs 29.46 [4.68] mm HG; P = .002) and a greater orthostatic decline in cerebral blood flow velocity (17.08 [8.72] cm/sec vs 13.68 [5.04] cm/sec; P < .001) in the CSS group. Both groups had similar prevalence of autonomic failure (223 [84.5%] vs. 33 [80.5%]; P = .67, mostly mild intensity), and abnormal skin biopsy (43% in both groups). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that CSS was common in patients with POTS and may represent a higher-order sequela of cerebrovascular, respiratory, and autonomic dysregulation. This heightened central processing may amplify symptom perception through altered interoceptive signaling. Central sensitization and autonomic impairment may coexist, and management should focus on both conditions.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System SensitizationPostural Orthostatic Tachycardia SyndromeAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID41528744
PMCPMC12801080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.