Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528703›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

A Workflow for Phytoplasma Discovery and Characterization in Potential Insect Vectors: From Non-destructive DNA Extraction and Vouchering to Next-Generation Sequencing.

Valeria Trivellone, Yanghui Cao, Christopher H Dietrich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valeria TrivelloneIllinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA. valeria3@illinois.edu.
Yanghui CaoIllinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Christopher H DietrichIllinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect vectors remain unknown for most currently described phytoplasmas, and even known vectors are often understudied because voucher specimens essential to corroborating the species identification are rarely preserved and made available for subsequent analysis. However, because phytoplasmas often concentrate in the bodies of potential insect vectors that feed on infected plant phloem, recent studies have shown that screening DNA extracted from such insects is an efficient means for detecting and characterizing phytoplasmas in natural and anthropogenic ecosystems. Given uncertainties in morphology-based identification of insects and ongoing changes in insect taxonomy, an improved workflow is needed to integrate taxonomy, molecular biology, and epidemiology in host-pathogen research. Here we describe a newly established workflow to: (1) collect, handle, and preserve voucher specimens of potential vectors of phytoplasma; (2) non-destructively extract DNA from potentially infected insect specimens; (3) efficiently screen insect specimens for the presence of phytoplasmas; and (4) conduct downstream NGS analysis for multilocus characterization of phytoplasma strains and associated insect gut contents.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInsect VectorsPhytoplasmaAnimalsSequence Analysis, DNAWorkflowDNA, BacterialDatabasingInsect collectionNGS analysisNon-destructive nucleic acid extractionPathogenVouchers

Identifiers

PMID41528703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.