Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528696›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Phytoplasma Detection and Identification: Tools for Their Classification.

Assunta Bertaccini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Assunta BertacciniAlma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. assunta.bertaccini@unibo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A summary of the situation for detecting and naming phytoplasmas associated with different diseases in the last 30 years is presented in this chapter. In the last decades, a great amount of research has been devoted to classifying and differentiating these prokaryotes by molecular and bioinformatic tools applied to the analysis of specific phytoplasma genes. The availability of a robust classification system has greatly facilitated phytoplasma identification, leading to increased knowledge of their associated plant diseases worldwide. Scientific knowledge on phytoplasma biology still needs to be improved to allow better and more focused management solutions with minimal impact on the environment to mitigate the severity of these diseases in both agricultural and natural environments, also contributing to reduce the loss of biodiversity.

Indexed as

PhytoplasmaPhytoplasma DiseaseComputational BiologyPhylogenyPlant DiseasesBacteria‘Candidatus Phytoplasma' speciesMolecular methodsPlant diseaseProvisional taxonomy

Identifiers

PMID41528696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.