SynthesisCJEM2026
Two- vs three-hour hs-cTnI algorithms for ruling out acute myocardial infarction using the Beckman access high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I: a systematic review.
Synthesis in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome make up a significant proportion of emergency department (EDs) presentations. High-sensitivity troponin testing is a standard component of evaluating patients with suspected symptomatic coronary disease. We sought to synthesize the evidence of the accuracy of 0/2-h and 0/3-h algorithms using the Beckman Access high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay.
methodsWe developed an electronic search strategy retrieving research from three electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and Wiley Cochrane Library). Relevant research studies were screened and data extracted by a team of reviewers. Study quality and risk assessment were appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool. Findings were reported according to PRISMA guidelines.
resultsFive studies met inclusion criteria. No studies directly compared the 0 h/2 h and 0 h/3 h algorithms using the Beckman Coulter Access hs-cTnI assay, and heterogeneity in study design precluded meta-analysis. Included studies variably used 2-h, 3-h, or intermediate timepoints for serial troponin measurement. All studies reported consistently high sensitivity (> 97.7%) and NPV (> 98.9%) for ruling out acute myocardial infarction, supporting the reliability of both 0/2 h and 0/3 h hs-cTnI algorithms in the ED.
conclusionsOf the five studies included, two studies suggest that a two-hour hs-TnI algorithm can effectively rule out myocardial infarction with similar accuracy to a longer three-hour protocol. Use of a 2-h hs-cTnI algorithm may lead to operational gains compared to a 3-h serial testing algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41528672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.