ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Human Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Involved Strategies: Advancing Tendon Injuries Therapy Towards Clinical Translation.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effective repair of tendon injuries represents a significant challenge in the selection of an appropriate regeneration strategy. Meanwhile, umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) have been employed in the treatment of a range of diseases due to a number of advantageous characteristics, including low immunogenicity, high proliferation and differentiation potential, extensive availability, ease of large-scale production, absence of ethical constraints, and immunomodulatory functions. It has demonstrated considerable clinical application potential and offer a promising avenue for the treatment of tendon injuries. The core strategies may be broadly classified into three categories: direct stem cell injection, transplantation of biological scaffolds with tissue engineering technology, and the use of stem cell-derived products. This review will provide an in-depth analysis of the pathophysiological mechanisms of tendon repair, describe the unique properties of UC-MSCs, and systematically evaluate the advantages and limitations of these treatment strategies, aiming to provide a solid theoretical basis and scientific guidance for the biological research and clinical application of UC-MSCs in the field of tendon repair. The translational potential of this article: Given the low immunogenicity, good biosafety, and strong differentiation potential possessed by UC-MSCs, it is expected to provide a both safe and effective therapeutic option for tendon injuries through certain processing measures, such as combining UC-MSCs with biomaterials or extracting their products. In addition, the extraction process of UC-MSCs is simple and non-invasive, which makes it easy to realize clinical mass production. Therefore, the use of UC-MSCs for tendon repair is significant for clinical translation of tendon injury treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41528668What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.