ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2026
Joint Developmental Trajectories of Bullying Victimization/Perpetration and Bystanders' Defending Behavior in Adolescence: A Latent Growth Mixture Model.
Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity in the Joint Trajectories of Bullying Victimization and Defending Behavior among Adolescents: The Role of Anti-Bullying Attitudes and Peer Status.Journal of youth and adolescence · 2026Article
- How Does Mothers' Parental Burnout Longitudinally Predict Adolescent Bullying Perpetration and Victimization? The Mediating Role of Psychological Control Rather than Autonomy Support.Journal of youth and adolescence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bullying represents a significant public health challenge during adolescence, with profound implications for victimized and perpetrating youth. Although prior research has extensively examined developmental pathways of bullying involvement, few studies have investigated how these pathways co-develop with prosocial bystander behaviors such as peer defending. Using three-wave longitudinal data from 1369 Chinese adolescents (50.8% female, Mage = 14.81, SD = 1.16), the current study employed parallel-process latent growth mixture modeling to identify joint developmental trajectories of bullying victimization/perpetration and defending behavior. Three distinct trajectory classes emerged in both the victimization-defending and perpetration-defending models: a high-defending group (14.83%–16.14%) characterized by low bullying involvement and high peer-nominated defending; a high-bullying involvement group (14.98%–21.62%) exhibiting elevated victimization or perpetration and low defending; and a normative group (63.55%–68.88%) with low bullying and moderate self-reported—but low peer-nominated—defending. Cross-classification revealed meaningful subgroups, including bully-victims and victim-defenders. Peer acceptance, mindful parenting, and social-emotional competency and acceptance goals increased adolescents’ likelihood of falling into the high-defending group, whereas peer rejection, harsh parenting, and popularity goals heightened their risk of being placed in the high-bullying involvement group. These findings advance a nuanced understanding of the heterogeneity in adolescent social roles and highlight the differential roles of ecological factors in shaping the co-development of bullying and defending behaviors during this critical developmental period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41528627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.