Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528620›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2026

When 'Calls for Help' Backfire: Induced Plant Volatiles Reduce the Attraction of a Nocturnal Predator in Sugarcane.

Marvin Pec, Paolo Salazar-Mendoza, Kamila E X Azevedo, Diego M Magalhães, Italo Delalibera, José Maurício S Bento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marvin PecDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8512-8008
Paolo Salazar-MendozaDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil. paolo.salazar@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6791-1616
Kamila E X AzevedoDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7502-1146
Diego M MagalhãesDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9757-3726
Italo DelaliberaDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9770-9216
José Maurício S BentoDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, 13418-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8655-5178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While herbivore-induced plant volatiles are well-established cues that guide natural enemies to herbivores in ecosystems, microbe-induced plant volatiles have recently gained attention as promising tools for achieving similar outcomes. However, how nocturnal predators respond to volatile cues induced by herbivory and/or endophytic fungal remains poorly understood, particularly in systems where the predator and plant do not share a tightly co-evolved or highly specialized relationship. To explore this, we investigated whether Spodoptera frugiperda infestation and Metarhizium robertsii endophytic colonization in sugarcane plants could enhance the olfactory attraction of the nocturnal earwig predator Doru luteipes by modifying nocturnal volatile emissions and altering endogenous levels of jasmonic acid and salicylic acid. Unexpectedly, the changes in volatile emissions and phytohormone levels induced by herbivory and microbial colonization led to a reduced attraction of the predator compared with undamaged control plants and with the no-plant control. These findings highlight the complexity of D. luteipes' responses to induced indirect defenses in sugarcane, suggesting that such strategies may not consistently enhance the recruitment of natural enemies.

Indexed as

InsectaPredatory BehaviorSaccharumSpodopteraVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsCyclopentanesHerbivoryMetarhiziumOxylipinsSalicylic AcidCyclopentanesjasmonic acidOxylipinsSalicylic AcidVolatile Organic CompoundsDoru luteipesEarwigIndirect defenseMetarhizium robertsiiOlfactory attractionSpodoptera frugiperda

Identifiers

PMID41528620
PMCPMC12799659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.