ArticleMycopathologia2026
Concurrent Administration of Triazoles with Chemotherapeutic and/or Immunosuppressant Agents Known to Have Moderate-to-Severe Drug-Drug Interactions in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Hospitalized for Invasive Aspergillosis.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTriazoles are widely used for treatment and prevention of invasive aspergillosis (IA) but can cause serious drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with chemotherapeutic (CT) and immunosuppressant (IS) agents via CYP3A4 inhibition. The frequency of triazole-CT or IS concurrent administration in hematologic malignancies (HM) patients newly admitted with IA is largely unknown.
methodsWe studied US IQVIA claims including adults with ≥ 1 claim for an inpatient stay with a diagnosis code for IA from October 1, 2015-November 30, 2022 and evidence of systemic antifungal therapy for ≥ 3 days during the hospitalization. The cohort was limited to patients with ≥ 1 HM diagnosis code within 6 months prior to IA admission. Utilization of triazoles with CT and/or ISs known to have moderate-to-severe pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions was described.
resultsTriazoles, predominantly isavuconazole (61.0%) and voriconazole (53.6%), were administered in 97.2% of 317 patients with IA. Of these, 241 (78.2%) received an interacting CT and/or IS. Potentially interacting agents administered with a triazole included corticosteroids (70.8%), calcineurin or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (25.0%) (84.4% tacrolimus), alkylating agents (14.0%) (76.7% cyclophosphamide), venetoclax (9.7%), anthracyclines (6.2%), and vincristine (5.8%).
conclusionsConcurrent administration of triazole with potential PK interactions with CT or IS agents occurred in most HM patients admitted for IA. Choosing alternative antifungals, therapeutic drug monitoring of triazoles or selective ISs, and dosage adjustment of CT/IS agents may mitigate the risk of adverse DDIs. New antifungal agents without serious DDIs with CT and/or IS agents are needed for treatment of IA to reduce the risk of serious adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.