Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528584›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026

Concomitant capitellum fractures in patients with radial head fractures: incidence, risk factors and primary outcomes.

Qing Yang, Xiaoqiang Wang, Guoying Deng, Xingguang Tao, Qiugen Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qing YangYueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoqiang WangYueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Guoying DengTrauma center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xingguang TaoQingpu Branch of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Qingpu District Central Hospital Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Qiugen WangYueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. wangqiugen@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to determine the incidence of combined radial head and capitellum fractures (CRHCF), identify risk factors for concomitant capitellum fractures (CCF) in patients with radial head fractures (RHF), and evaluate the primary outcomes of CRHCF.

methodsPatients with isolated RHF or CRHCF were retrospectively studied using our institutional fracture registry data from January 2013 to December 2022. Demographic data, injury mechanisms, fracture features, clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications were collected. Patients with isolated RHF were stratified into Group 1, while those with CRHCF were categorized into Group 2. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for CCF incidence. Elbow range of motion (ROM) was evaluated across different classification subgroups, and functional outcomes were quantified using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI).

resultsA total of 161 patients with RHF were enrolled, with a mean age of 45.2 ± 13.9 years. Of these, 28 cases (17.4%) were diagnosed as CRHCF. According to the Bryan-Morrey classification, CRHCF cases included 11 type I (46.4% of CRHCF), 14 type II (39.3% of CRHCF), and 3 type III (14.3% of CRHCF). Multivariate analysis identified five independent risk factors for CCF in RHF patients: ≥2 RHF fragments (2 fragments: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.39, P = 0.049; ≥3 fragments: aOR = 3.75, P = 0.007), high injury energy (aOR = 3.78, P = 0.008), elbow valgus deformity (≥ 15°, aOR = 3.12, P = 0.023), narrowed radial-capitellar joint space (aOR = 2.81, P = 0.036), and preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 7 points (aOR = 3.59, P = 0.008). Additionally, the severity of RHF (per Hm-Mason classification) was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (p = 0.027). All patients completed follow-up, with a mean duration of 18.2 ± 6.5 months. During follow-up, all fractures achieved union without significant complications. Correlation analysis showed that the Bryan-Morrey classification was associated with functional scores: patients with type II, I, and III CRHCF exhibited sequentially poorer functional outcomes, characterized by higher DASH scores and lower MEPI scores (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsThis study shows CRHCF incidence is higher than clinically assumed, with five independent risk factors identified. Bryan-Morrey type II fractures had the most favorable DASH and MEPS scores. Additional case series are needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Fractures, MultipleHumeral Fractures, DistalRadial Head and Neck FracturesRadius FracturesAdultElbow InjuriesElbow JointFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCapitellum fractureClassificationFunctional outcomeRadial head fractureTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.