Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528583›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2026

Environment and CVD: moving from Risk Prediction to Risk Management.

Tasveer Khawaja, El Hussain Shamsa, Sanjay Rajagopalan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tasveer KhawajaUniversity Hospitals, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
El Hussain ShamsaUniversity Hospitals, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Sanjay RajagopalanUniversity Hospitals, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. sxr647@case.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe attempt to provide a framework for cardiovascular risk assessment related to environmental pollutants to enhance awareness of risk posed by environmental risk factors and highlight approaches for risk intervention. RECENT

findingsIndisputable links between environmental exposures and cardiovascular outcomes exist. Although many of these relationships are well studied, such as air pollution, evidence continues to emerge regarding others, including noise, light, the built environment, and temperature. When the totality of the impact from environmental exposures are considered under the paradigm of the exposome, their health impact and disease burden form a considerable part of mitigatable residual cardiovascular risk. This risk can be attenuated by policy and, to a lesser extent, individual level actions. By harnessing artificial intelligence, we can move to integrated risk exposure analysis and target those at the highest risk with interventions.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesEnvironmental ExposureRisk ManagementAir PollutionHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAir pollutionCardiovascular preventionExposomeResidual cardiovascular risk

Identifiers

PMID41528583
PMCPMC12799635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.