ReviewCurrent urology reports2026
Applications of Point of Care Ultrasound in Urology Residency Training: A Practical Framework for Curriculum Design and Implementation.
Review in Current urology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become an indispensable diagnostic and procedural tool across many medical specialties. However, formalized ultrasound training within urology residency programs remains limited. This review aims to outline a practical framework for designing and implementing a structured POCUS curriculum tailored specifically to urology training. RECENT
findingsVarious programs have implemented POCUS curricula, often with longitudinal instruction, modular content, hands-on training, and competency-based assessments. While urology has historically relied on sporadic exposure, often limited to prostate biopsies or intraoperative imaging, recent integration into the residency training demonstrates the utility of ultrasound amongst all urologic organs. National surveys of residents and practicing urologists reveal persistent deficiencies in both confidence and formal training opportunities, despite high interest and perceived clinical value. A review of emerging urology-specific curricula shows that programs adopting structured, multimodal approaches, combining didactics, video-based learning, supervised training, and simulation report improvements in user confidence, technical proficiency, and clinical utilization. Early data suggest that when implemented longitudinally, these frameworks can help to broaden ultrasound use in clinical settings. However, published experiences remain limited to a small number of institutions, underscoring the need for broader utilization and interventional studies. Current literature supports a structured POCUS curriculum for urology trainees, yet widespread adoption remains at an early stage. A unified framework could help standardize expectations, ensure equitable training experiences, and better prepare residents for modern practice. Multi-institutional collaboration, increased research on educational outcomes, and potential guidance from accrediting bodies will be critical to advancing ultrasound education and establishing national standards for urologic POCUS training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41528568What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.