Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528539›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

Predictive processing in L2 learners: contributions of cognitive and affective factors.

Shaohua Fang, Xinmiao Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaohua FangDepartment of English, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3342-5764
Xinmiao LiuNational Research Centre for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China. liuxinmiao@bfsu.edu.cn.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2021JJ024National Social Science Major Bidding Project of China 22&ZD298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of cognitive (working memory, inhibitory control) and affective (mood) factors on semantic prediction in second language (L2) learners. While predictive processing was observed in first language (L1) speakers, albeit in later regions. it was largely absent at the group level among L2 learners. However, individual differences played a significant role in modulating prediction in both groups. In L2 learners, predictive effects were stronger among those with higher proficiency and better inhibitory control, whereas negative mood was more detrimental to prediction than positive mood was facilitative. For L1 speakers, inhibitory control, but not working memory, enhanced prediction, particularly in the presence of positive mood. These findings contribute novel insights by integrating affective and cognitive factors in explaining semantic prediction in L1 speakers and L2 learners.

Indexed as

AffectCognitionInhibition, PsychologicalLearningMemory, Short-TermMultilingualismAdultFemaleHumansIndividualityMaleSemanticsYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.